The Economics of Going Viral in Real Estate
Review Boring Details Here <--
The Temptation to Perform
There is a new pressure in real estate that did not exist twenty years ago: the pressure to perform publicly.
Platforms like TikTok reward visibility, not accuracy. They reward speed, not depth. And they reward certainty, even when certainty is misplaced.
I have participated in it myself. I have tried to show up, speak plainly, and explain how things actually work.
The result is predictable: modest engagement.
And then I watch other agents post.
Highly produced clips. Confident delivery. Strong claims. Sometimes dangerously strong claims.
They go viral.
So the question becomes unavoidable:
Is the market rewarding clarity — or performance?
What Is Actually Being Sold
A significant portion of real estate content today is not about real estate mechanics. It is about attention capture.
You will see:
Software being promoted as if it is a strategic advantage rather than an operational tool
Tax strategies presented without context, caveats, or legal boundaries
Simplified narratives about “winning” in negotiations that ignore risk entirely
Take one example that appears frequently: bonus depreciation paired with claims of “active participation” to offset W-2 income.
Presented casually, it sounds sophisticated.
In practice, if the underlying intent and behavior do not match the tax position being taken, it crosses into misrepresentation.
That is not strategy. That is exposure.
The issue is not just that this content exists.
The issue is that it is delivered with confidence — and confidence converts.
See my series on Bonus Depreciation. I stand by it and I am 100% certain someone is going to buy on 30a and think they are ok, get audited and get a tax penalty of substantial proportions. I am also certain that when they sell and they wonder why the tax bill that could have been $25,000 per 100K is now $37,000 per 100K of depreciation recapture. I am guilty as charged for being overly complete, but do not follow those that are telling you to be walking on the edge of fraud. Read this series and Let me know if you find it more informative that Tik Tok?
The Krugman Question: What Incentives Are We Creating?
If visibility is the reward function, then behavior will optimize around visibility.
This is not a moral failure. It is an economic one.
Agents are responding rationally to the incentives placed in front of them.
The algorithm rewards engagement
Engagement favors simplification and certainty
Simplification often removes nuance
Removing nuance increases risk for the consumer
Over time, the system selects for the most compelling storyteller — not the most accurate advisor.
And once that equilibrium forms, it becomes self-reinforcing.
The Friedman Question: What Are the Consequences?
Milton Friedman would ask a simpler question: what happens when people act on this information?
If a buyer follows tax advice that was designed for a 30-second clip rather than a full analysis, the consequences are not theoretical.
They are financial.
They are legal.
And they are personal.
Real estate decisions are not reversible in the way content is.
You cannot “scroll past” a bad purchase structure.
You live with it.
The Personal Tension
Here is the part that is harder to admit.
When you produce grounded, reality-based content and it does not perform, you begin to question your approach.
You start to ask:
Am I explaining things poorly?
Am I missing what people actually want?
Or is the system simply not designed to reward this kind of thinking?
That tension is real.
And it creates a quiet pressure to adjust — to simplify more, to sharpen the hook, to edge closer to certainty than the facts justify.
Who Is the Audience?
There is another possibility that is rarely discussed.
Much of this content may not be attracting serious buyers at all.
It may be circulating primarily among other agents.
Agents watching agents.
Learning presentation styles. Borrowing language. Replicating tone.
If that is true, then the perceived success of this content may be overstated from a business development standpoint.
Views are not clients.
Engagement is not trust.
And visibility is not the same as conversion.
Reality vs. Performance
So the question becomes more direct.
Is this the new economy of real estate?
Or is it a parallel economy — one built on attention rather than transactions?
Because the actual business of real estate still operates on different rules:
Contracts must hold up
Financing must close
Tax positions must withstand scrutiny
Decisions must make sense over time
No algorithm can substitute for that.
A Strategic Decision
At some point, every professional has to decide what game they are playing.
You can optimize for reach.
Or you can optimize for accuracy and trust.
In the short term, those paths can look very different.
In the long term, they tend to converge — but not always in the way people expect.
Because credibility compounds more slowly than attention.
But it compounds more reliably.
And when the stakes are high, reliability is what people actually pay for.
Final Thought
The real risk is not that some agents go viral.
The real risk is that serious professionals begin to believe that going viral is the same as being effective.
It is not.
And confusing the two is where the real cost begins.